Volume 22 : Issue 2
The privacy rights of American citizens have been eroding with metronomic regularity given the sharp rise in the government’s reliance on surreptitious electronic surveillance, warrantless digital searches, and deliberately engineered cybersecurity vulnerabilities—all of which have occurred with the sort of ubiquity that few could ever have previously imagined. The dangers of unfettered government searches and seizures are pervasive and grave. A world without a strong footing in the democratic principles and ideals of the Enlightenment upon which our country was founded would be a dark world indeed.
This Article analyzes the constitutionality of the United States government’s use of emerging technology to conduct warrantless searches of private citizens and companies, including their digital transmissions and stored electronic data. The analysis begins with an examination of the legal background of the Fourth Amendment, focusing on Katz v. United States and its progeny, including a review of the most recent U.S. Supreme Court cases in the area of privacy and the Fourth Amendment: Carpenter v. United States, Riley v. California, and United States v. Jones. While evaluating the government’s actions with respect to warrantless searches and surveillance in the post-Katz era, this Article turns to specific examples of surreptitious governmental monitoring programs that likely run awry of the rule of law and the United States Constitution.
This Article then considers the greater normative and policy implications of the government’s arguably extralegal conduct, including the potential for the derision of democratic values and ideals that may, in turn, result in the weakening of our country’s political framework and cybersecurity infrastructure. Sacrificing the ideals of our democracy in order to ostensibly protect it may instead serve to lead us down a road of dangerous folly. Such constitutional erosion could lead the United States down a dangerously precipitous decline. For the greater good, it may be wise if the government were to carefully heed the maxims “respice finem” and “obsta principiis” before it strays from its fundamental democratic mandates.
There Is Always More than Law! From Low IP Regimes to a Governance Perspective in Copyright Research
by Dr. Christian Katzenbach
A Case Against Bad Math
Note by Peggy Bruner
Extraterritorial Application of Data Privacy Law – How the Stored Communications Act Lags Behind Modern Technology
Case Comment by Andrew Bayudan